Chip Manufacturing · Topic 7 of 16
0%
Photolithography
Printing each layer's pattern onto the wafer with light — the step that decides how small a chip's features can be.
Quick start
- Photolithography prints a pattern onto the wafer using light shone through a mask and a light-sensitive coating called photoresist.
- It does not build the transistor by itself — it draws a temporary stencil in resist that later steps (etch, deposition, implant) use to shape the real material.
- The whole layer is not drawn in one flash: the pattern is projected field by field, and the full sequence is repeated for every layer of the chip.
- How small a feature can be printed depends on the light's wavelength, the optics, and clever process tricks — captured by Resolution ≈ k₁ · λ / NA.
- Each new layer must line up with the ones beneath it. That alignment accuracy is called overlay, and it is as important as resolution.
Prerequisites
What you’ll learn
- What photolithography actually does, and what it does not
- How light, a mask, and photoresist turn a design into a pattern on silicon
- Why resolution is set by wavelength, optics, and process — not wavelength alone
- How layers are aligned to each other, and why overlay error matters
- What can go wrong, how it is measured, and why control is so hard
Why it matters
Photolithography is the pacing step of chip making: it defines the smallest features on every layer, is repeated dozens of times per wafer, and its precision directly sets how many working chips a fab can produce. When people say a chip is '3 nm' or '5 nm', they are really talking about what lithography (with etch and deposition) can pattern.
Beginner intuition
Think of a photographic stencil. Light shines through a patterned mask onto a light-sensitive film on the wafer; where the light lands, the film's chemistry changes, and developing washes part of it away to leave the pattern behind.
It is like a projector, not a stamp: the mask pattern is projected and shrunk by a lens onto a small area of the wafer, then the wafer steps over and the projection repeats — again and again across the whole wafer.
And it is like printing a book in many passes of a press that must register perfectly: a chip is built from many patterned layers, and each pass has to land on top of the last one with almost no misalignment.
Where it fits in chip manufacturing
Lithography sits between preparing a film (deposition) and shaping it (etch, or implant/deposition), and this whole block repeats for every layer — a modern chip goes through the litho step dozens of times, not once.
- Silicon wafer
- Film formation / deposition
- Photoresist
- Photolithography
- Etching
- Doping
- Cleaning / processing
- Repeated layer formation
- Interconnect formation
- Wafer test
- Dicing
- Packaging
- Final test
- Finished device
A conceptual learning map, not a literal one-pass sequence — real fabrication repeats and interleaves many of these steps many times to build a chip layer by layer.
Explanation
Photolithography (often just 'litho' or 'patterning') is how a circuit design is transferred onto the wafer. A layer of light-sensitive photoresist is coated on the wafer, light is projected through a patterned mask, and developing the resist leaves a stencil that protects some regions and exposes others. Later steps — etching, deposition, or ion implantation — act only where the resist allows, so the resist pattern becomes a real pattern in the chip's materials.
A stepper or scanner projects the mask (reticle) pattern, usually demagnified about 4×, onto one field of the resist-coated wafer, then steps to the next field and repeats. Resolution improves with shorter wavelength and higher numerical aperture, and with process techniques that lower the k₁ factor.
Deep-ultraviolet (193 nm) light — extended for years with immersion and multiple patterning — carried the industry through many generations and still patterns most layers today. Extreme-ultraviolet (13.5 nm, EUV) now handles the very smallest features, but litho is not one technology: contact/proximity printing, i-line and KrF DUV, 193 nm dry and immersion, and EUV all coexist, chosen per layer by what a feature needs.
Because a chip is many stacked patterned layers, every exposure must align to the layers already on the wafer. Getting the pattern small enough (resolution) and landing it accurately on the previous layers (overlay) are the two things litho must do well at the same time.
How it works
Coat: the wafer is coated with a thin, uniform film of photoresist, typically by dispensing liquid resist and spinning the wafer so it spreads evenly.
Soft bake: gentle heating drives off solvent and stabilizes the resist film so it responds predictably to light.
Align: the tool measures alignment marks on the wafer and positions it so the new pattern will register to the existing layers.
Expose: light is projected through the mask/reticle and the projection optics onto one field of the wafer, delivering a controlled dose in sharp focus; the exposure is scanned or stepped across the wafer field by field.
Post-exposure bake: heating drives the light-triggered chemistry (e.g. in chemically amplified resists) to completion and smooths out standing-wave effects.
Develop: a developer solution removes the resist that should go — the exposed regions for a positive resist, the unexposed regions for a negative resist — leaving the patterned stencil.
Inspect / measure: the printed pattern's feature size (CD) and alignment (overlay) are measured before the wafer moves on; if the print is off, resist can be stripped and the layer reworked (unlike the etch that follows).
Step-by-step process
- Surface preparation — Clean and prime the wafer surface so resist adheres uniformly and repeatably.
- Resist coat — Apply a thin, uniform photoresist film — thickness and uniformity are set here and matter for the whole layer.
- Soft bake — Remove solvent and stabilize the film so exposure behaves predictably.
- Alignment — Read alignment marks and position the wafer so the new layer registers to the layers below.
- Exposure — Project the mask pattern onto the resist at the right dose and focus, field by field across the wafer.
- Post-exposure bake — Complete the light-driven chemistry and reduce standing-wave roughness.
- Development — Wash away the soluble resist to reveal the physical pattern that guides the next step.
- Pattern inspection — Measure critical dimension and overlay; rework the resist if the print is out of spec.
The physics, chemistry & engineering behind it
Photoresist is a polymer whose solubility changes where light hits it. A positive resist becomes soluble where exposed (the pattern matches the clear parts of the mask); a negative resist becomes insoluble where exposed (the pattern is reversed). Which one is used depends on the layer.
Resolution is governed by diffraction: light passing through fine mask features spreads out, blurring the smallest details. The Rayleigh relation Resolution ≈ k₁ · λ / NA captures the three levers — wavelength λ, numerical aperture NA, and the process factor k₁.
Shorter wavelength (193 nm DUV → 13.5 nm EUV) and higher NA both sharpen the smallest printable feature. NA is raised with better/larger optics and, for DUV, immersion (water between the last lens and the wafer). EUV uses reflective mirror optics rather than transmissive lenses because 13.5 nm light is absorbed by glass and air, so it runs in vacuum.
The k₁ factor lumps together the process cleverness — illumination shaping, resist chemistry, mask corrections, and multiple patterning — that pushes features below what wavelength and NA alone would allow. Lowering k₁ is why 193 nm light kept printing far below 193 nm for years.
Depth of focus — the range over which the image stays sharp — shrinks as resolution improves, which is why wafer flatness, focus control, and thin uniform resist become harder and more important at the leading edge.
Equipment
- Coater / developer (track)
- Coats resist, bakes, and develops; usually linked directly to the exposure tool so wafers flow through as one process.
- Scanner / stepper
- The exposure tool: it holds the reticle, projects and demagnifies the pattern, and steps/scans it across the wafer.
- Illumination system
- The light source and optics that shape how the mask is lit — the shape of the illumination is itself tuned to improve resolution.
- Projection optics
- Precision lenses (DUV) or mirrors (EUV) that form the demagnified image of the mask on the resist.
- Wafer stage
- Moves and holds the wafer with extreme positional accuracy, stepping between fields and keeping focus during the scan.
- Alignment & focus systems
- Sensors that read alignment marks and wafer height so each field lands in the right place, in focus.
- Reticle / mask
- The patterned master (typically 4× the printed size) that carries one layer's design into the tool.
- Metrology tools
- Separate CD, overlay, and defect-inspection systems that measure the printed result and feed process control.
Materials
- Photoresist
- The light-sensitive polymer that records the pattern; formulated differently for DUV vs EUV and for each layer's needs.
- Anti-reflective coatings
- Thin layers above or below the resist that suppress reflections which would otherwise distort the printed feature.
- Developer & solvents
- Chemistries that dissolve the intended resist regions cleanly without attacking the rest.
- Photomask / reticle blank
- A flat, ultra-clean substrate carrying the absorber pattern (with a pellicle to keep particles out of focus).
- Immersion fluid (DUV)
- Ultra-pure water placed between the final optic and the wafer to raise the effective numerical aperture.
Process parameters that matter
- Exposure dose
- How much light energy the resist receives; too little or too much shifts feature size and can leave resist behind or wash it away.
- Focus
- How sharply the image lands on the resist; going out of focus blurs edges and narrows the usable process window.
- Overlay / alignment
- How accurately the new layer lands on the previous ones; small errors can misconnect features between layers.
- Resist thickness & uniformity
- Set at the coat step; affects dose response, focus margin, and how faithfully the pattern transfers.
- Critical dimension (CD)
- The measured width of the printed features — the number the whole step is trying to hit consistently across the wafer and lot.
- Process window
- The combined range of dose and focus over which features still meet spec; a wider window means a more robust, higher-yielding process.
A note on numbers
Visual explanation
Key terminology
- Photoresist
- A light-sensitive coating that records the mask pattern and becomes a temporary stencil after developing.
- Mask vs reticle
- A reticle carries one field's pattern (often 4×) that is projected and stepped across the wafer; 'mask' is the general term, and in 1:1 contact/proximity printing the mask covers the whole wafer at once.
- Scanner / stepper
- The exposure tool that projects the reticle pattern onto the wafer, field by field.
- Numerical aperture (NA)
- A measure of how much light the optics collect; higher NA resolves finer features.
- k₁ factor
- A process factor bundling all the tricks (illumination, resist, mask correction, multiple patterning) that push features below the raw wavelength/NA limit.
- DUV
- Deep-ultraviolet lithography (e.g. 193 nm), including immersion; still patterns most layers.
- EUV
- Extreme-ultraviolet lithography at 13.5 nm, using reflective mirror optics in vacuum for the smallest features.
- Critical dimension (CD)
- The width of the smallest printed features, the key quantity litho controls.
- Overlay
- How accurately a new layer aligns to the layers already on the wafer.
- Depth of focus
- The range of wafer position over which the projected image stays acceptably sharp.
Formula
The Rayleigh criterion. It tells an engineer which levers move the smallest printable feature: shorter wavelength λ, larger numerical aperture NA, and a smaller process factor k₁ — not just wavelength.
Example
Common mistakes
Watch out for:
- Thinking litho builds the transistor. It only prints a temporary resist stencil; etch, deposition, and implant create the actual device using that stencil.
- Believing the whole chip is drawn in a single flash of light. The pattern is projected field by field and the whole sequence is repeated for every layer.
- Assuming feature size equals the light's wavelength. Process tricks (the k₁ factor) print features well below the wavelength — 193 nm light patterned features far smaller than 193 nm for years.
- Thinking EUV is 'the' lithography. EUV handles the smallest layers, but DUV and older methods still pattern most layers and remain essential.
- Focusing only on resolution and forgetting overlay. Landing each layer accurately on the previous ones is just as critical as printing small features.
Real-world application
Leading-edge scanners are among the most complex machines ever built, tracking and positioning the wafer thousands of times a second at picometer-scale precision, and no single company makes an entire advanced litho system alone — it depends on a worldwide supply chain of optics, sources, masks, resists, and metrology.
Defects & failure modes
What can go wrong:
- Under- or over-exposure: wrong dose leaves features too wide, too narrow, or with residual resist ('scumming') that blocks the next step.
- Defocus: features print blurred or with sloped sidewalls when the image falls outside the depth of focus.
- Overlay error: the layer lands shifted or rotated relative to the layers below, misconnecting features between layers.
- Resist defects and particles: pinholes, bubbles, or airborne/particle contamination create missing or extra pattern that can kill a chip.
- Pattern collapse: very tall, thin resist lines topple during development as surface tension pulls them over.
- CD variation and line-edge roughness (LER): feature width drifts across the wafer or wiggles along an edge, hurting device matching and performance.
- Incomplete development: developer fails to fully clear the intended resist, leaving residue that distorts the transferred pattern.
Measurement & metrology
Critical-dimension metrology measures printed feature widths (e.g. with CD-SEM or scatterometry) to confirm the pattern hit its target across the wafer.
Overlay metrology measures how well the new layer aligns to previous layers using dedicated targets, feeding corrections back to the scanner.
Defect inspection scans wafers optically or with e-beam to find particles, pattern defects, and repeating (mask-related) faults.
The key mindset: litho makes the pattern, metrology measures it. Making and measuring are separate jobs — measurement is what closes the loop and keeps the process in control run to run.
Yield impact
Because litho repeats on every layer, a small systematic error is multiplied many times over a wafer's life — a modest CD or overlay drift on several layers can quietly erode yield.
A single killer particle or pattern defect in the wrong place can disable an entire chip, so defect density in litho strongly gates how many good dies a wafer yields.
A wider process window (dose × focus × overlay margin) is worth as much as raw resolution: it is what keeps yield high as tools and materials drift.
Design implications
- Design rules encode what litho can reliably print: minimum feature sizes, spacings, and shapes that stay inside the process window.
- Layouts are drawn to be manufacturable, not just electrically ideal — restricted, regular patterns print more predictably than arbitrary geometry.
- The design must tolerate real overlay and CD variation, leaving enough margin that layers still connect when every step is slightly off.
- At the leading edge, what the design team can draw and what the litho team can print are decided together — the layout is co-designed with the patterning process.
Manufacturing & industry context
Lithography tools are among the most complex and capital-intensive machines in manufacturing, and the litho module is often the largest single equipment investment and throughput bottleneck in a fab.
The ecosystem is deep: scanner makers, mask/reticle shops, resist and materials suppliers, and metrology vendors all have to advance together for a new node to work.
Progress increasingly comes from squeezing k₁ — better illumination, resist, mask correction, and patterning schemes — as much as from moving to shorter wavelengths, because each wavelength jump is enormously expensive and hard-won.
Go deeper: engineering & research
Optional expandable sections that build from engineer to advanced to researcher level. The basics above are enough for a first read — open these when you want the depth.
The physics, in equationsEngineer
Everything litho can and cannot print traces back to diffraction — light bending as it passes fine mask features. A handful of relationships turn that physics into numbers an engineer can reason about. In each one, the wavelength, the optics, and a process factor appear again and again.
Variables
Meaning: NA measures how steep a cone of light the optics can collect and focus. Steeper cones capture more of the diffracted light that carries fine-feature information, so a higher NA prints finer features.
Assumptions
- Well-corrected optics with negligible aberrations.
- n is the index at the wafer: 1 in air/vacuum, about 1.44 for purified water at 193 nm.
Example: Dry 193 nm systems image through air (n = 1), so NA stays below 1. Flooding the gap with water (n ≈ 1.44) — immersion — lets NA reach roughly 1.35.
When each variable changes
- Wider light cone (larger θ) → higher NA → finer features.
- Higher medium index n (immersion) → higher NA at the same wavelength.
- NA above 1 is only reachable with immersion; in air or vacuum it is capped below 1.
Variables
Meaning: Sets the smallest half-pitch the process can resolve. Shorter wavelength, higher NA, and a lower k₁ all shrink R — which is why no single lever tells the whole story.
Assumptions
- Projection imaging operating near the diffraction limit.
- k₁ absorbs everything not in λ or NA; the hard physical floor for a single exposure is k₁ ≈ 0.25.
- R is a resolution limit, not a guaranteed manufacturable size (see the process-window deep dive).
Example: 193 nm immersion at NA = 1.35 with k₁ = 0.28 → R ≈ 0.28 × 193 / 1.35 ≈ 40 nm. EUV at 13.5 nm, NA = 0.33, k₁ = 0.4 → R ≈ 16 nm.
When each variable changes
- Shorter λ → smaller R (the leap from 193 nm DUV to 13.5 nm EUV).
- Higher NA → smaller R (immersion, and later high-NA EUV).
- Lower k₁ → smaller R, but k₁ cannot fall below ≈ 0.25 for a single exposure — which is exactly what forces fabs toward multiple patterning.
Variables
Meaning: How far the wafer can drift from perfect focus before features degrade. Because NA is squared, the very optics that sharpen resolution shrink the focus margin — the core tension of high-resolution imaging.
Assumptions
- Scalar imaging approximation.
- Single exposure; real budgets shrink further once wafer non-flatness and surface topography are added.
Example: 193 nm at NA = 1.35 with k₂ = 0.5 → DOF ≈ 0.5 × 193 / 1.35² ≈ 53 nm — only tens of nanometres, which is why wafer flatness and focus control are so demanding.
When each variable changes
- Higher NA → sharply smaller DOF (NA is squared) — resolution and focus margin pull in opposite directions.
- Shorter λ → smaller DOF.
- Larger k₂ (a more forgiving process) → larger DOF.
Variables
Meaning: How sharply the projected light swings between bright and dark at a feature edge. High contrast makes a crisp resist edge; low contrast blurs it, adding roughness and shrinking the process window. Engineers often track the closely related NILS (normalized image log-slope) as the practical edge-sharpness metric.
Assumptions
- Describes the optical (aerial) image only, before the resist reacts.
- Real edge quality also depends on resist chemistry and diffusion blur.
Example: As a pattern's pitch approaches λ/NA, diffracted orders are lost and I_min climbs toward I_max, so contrast falls and features 'wash out' — even when the resolution formula says the size is reachable.
When each variable changes
- Pitch shrinking toward the resolution limit → lower contrast.
- Illumination shaping, phase-shift masks, and higher NA → higher contrast.
- Higher contrast → sharper edges, less line-edge roughness, and a wider process window.
Resolution vs process windowEngineer
Reaching a resolution once, on one wafer in a lab, is not the same as manufacturing at that resolution. The gap between the two is the process window.
- The resolution formula gives the smallest feature the optics can form. Manufacturing must print that feature on every field, every wafer, and every lot — despite drift in focus, dose, materials, and the incoming surface.
- The process window is the overlap of dose and focus ranges over which every feature still meets its critical-dimension spec. A wide window means robust, high-yielding production; a razor-thin window means the size is a demonstration, not a product.
- Exposure latitude (dose margin) and depth of focus trade against each other: you can spend margin on one only by giving it up on the other, and the usable window is their overlap.
- Pushing k₁ lower or NA higher to reach a smaller feature usually shrinks the window too — lower contrast and smaller depth of focus — so raw resolution and robustness pull in opposite directions.
- This is why a research tool can show a feature a fab cannot yet ship: hitting a resolution once is not the same as centring a wide, stable process window on it.
Key point
Overlay & layer-to-layer registrationAdvanced
Resolution is about the size of features on one layer. Overlay is about landing each new layer accurately on the layers already built — a separate problem that becomes just as limiting as features shrink.
- Alignment: the scanner reads alignment marks printed on earlier layers and positions the wafer so the new pattern registers to them before exposing.
- Overlay error: the residual misregistration between layers that remains after alignment, measured on dedicated overlay targets.
- Overlay budget: the total misregistration a layer can tolerate, divided among many contributors — stage, alignment sensors, mask, wafer distortion, and errors inherited from prior layers. Each source must stay a small fraction of the whole.
- Wafer-stage accuracy: the stage must position and track the wafer with picometre-scale precision, thousands of times a second, while scanning each field.
- Process-induced distortion: deposition, etch, CMP, and thermal cycles physically warp the wafer between layers, shifting features non-uniformly; scanners model and correct these per wafer and per field.
- Why it scales harder: overlay must stay a fixed fraction of feature size, so the budget shrinks as features shrink — but the physical distortions do not shrink as fast. A metal line that prints perfectly but lands off its contact still fails, so overlay often limits scaling as much as resolution does.
Patterning strategiesAdvanced
Because a single exposure bottoms out at k₁ ≈ 0.25, fabs use several strategies to reach denser patterns. These are conceptual families, not recipes.
- Single patterning: one mask, one exposure per layer — the simplest and cheapest option, limited by the single-exposure resolution floor.
- Multiple patterning: split one dense layer across several masks and exposures so each sub-pattern is coarser than the final pitch, then combine them — for example litho-etch-litho-etch (LELE).
- Pitch splitting: decompose a dense pattern into two or more interleaved patterns at relaxed pitch, each printed separately — a common form of multiple patterning.
- Spacer-based (self-aligned) patterning: deposit thin spacers on the sidewalls of a printed template, then remove the template; the spacers define features at a fraction of the original pitch (SADP/SAQP). Density is set by film thickness rather than the exposure, giving excellent uniformity.
- EUV patterning: the shorter 13.5 nm wavelength restores single-exposure printing for many layers that DUV could reach only with multiple patterning — simplifying some flows, though the very hardest layers may still need EUV multiple patterning.
Key point
Computational lithographyAdvanced
At the leading edge the mask is computed, not drawn one-to-one. Software predicts how diffraction and resist will distort the pattern and pre-compensates for it.
- OPC (optical proximity correction): pre-distorts mask shapes — adding serifs, biasing widths, and inserting sub-resolution assist features — so diffraction produces the intended shape on the wafer.
- Source-mask optimization (SMO): jointly optimizes the illumination shape and the mask pattern to maximize contrast and process window for a given design.
- Inverse lithography (ILT): computes a freeform mask directly from the desired wafer image, rather than editing drawn shapes — often yielding curved, non-intuitive mask geometry.
- Process-window optimization: tunes the corrections so features meet spec across the whole expected dose and focus range, not only at the nominal setting.
- Simulation: physical models of the optics and resist predict what will actually print, so corrections are verified in software before an expensive mask is ever made.
Key point
Metrology & the process-control loopAdvanced
Photolithography is best understood not as a fixed recipe but as a feedback-control system: measure the result, correct the process, and apply the correction to the next wafers.
- Design
- Mask
- Exposure
- Development
- Measurement (CD, overlay, defects)
- Process correction
- Next wafer
- After patterning, wafers are measured for critical dimension, overlay, and defects, and the results are compared to targets.
- Corrections — dose, focus, and per-field alignment offsets — are fed back to the scanner and track so the next wafers are re-centred in the process window. In fabs this is called advanced process control (APC).
- Because litho repeats on every layer, this loop runs continuously: the fab is a controller constantly nudging the process against drift, not a machine running one frozen setting.
- Rework is possible before etch: an out-of-spec resist pattern can be stripped and re-exposed — a safety valve litho has that later, permanent steps (etch, implant) do not.
Research frontiers & open problemsResearcher
The topics below separate what is in high-volume production today from what is still being developed or ramped — a distinction worth keeping clear.
- Stochastic variability: at EUV each feature is formed from relatively few photons and resist molecules, so shot noise causes random CD variation and rare 'stochastic' defects (missing or merged features) — a leading yield concern at the smallest nodes.
- EUV photon statistics: 13.5 nm photons each carry more energy, so a given dose delivers fewer photons than DUV; fewer photons per feature raise statistical noise, tying dose, resolution, and defectivity together.
- Source power: EUV throughput depends on how much stable 13.5 nm power the source delivers; more power allows a higher dose (less stochastic noise) while keeping wafers-per-hour economic — an ongoing engineering push.
- Resist chemistry trade-offs: resolution, line-edge roughness, and sensitivity form a trilemma (the 'RLS trade-off') — improving one usually worsens another; metal-oxide and other new resists aim to break it.
- Roughness (LER/LWR): nanometre-scale edge wiggle feeds directly into transistor variability, making it a combined materials, imaging, and stochastic problem.
- Defectivity: finding and eliminating rare, pattern-dependent, and stochastic defects at production scale drives much inspection and resist research.
- Mask effects: EUV uses a reflective, 3D mask illuminated at an angle, causing shadowing and imaging asymmetries (mask-3D effects) that source-mask optimization must correct.
- Pellicles: thin membranes that keep particles off the mask must transmit EUV with minimal loss and survive high source power — a materials problem unique to EUV.
- High-NA EUV: raising EUV numerical aperture from about 0.33 toward roughly 0.55 extends single-exposure resolution, but uses anamorphic optics (different magnification in x and y), halves the exposure field, and tightens depth of focus — reshaping masks, resists, and integration. It is ramping, not mature.
- Process integration: none of these live in isolation — resist, mask, source, optics, overlay, etch, and design must advance together for a node to yield, so integration is often the real bottleneck.
Key point
Key takeaways
- Photolithography prints each layer's pattern onto the wafer with light and photoresist; it makes a temporary stencil, not the finished device.
- The pattern is projected field by field and the whole step is repeated for every layer — chip making is many interleaved litho cycles, not one.
- Resolution follows k₁ · λ / NA: wavelength, optics, and process cleverness together — not wavelength alone — set the smallest feature.
- Overlay (aligning each layer to the ones below) matters as much as resolution; both must be right at once.
- DUV and EUV coexist by layer, and yield hinges on defects, CD/overlay control, and a wide process window — which is why litho is measured as carefully as it is made.
References
- Lithography principles ↗ (ASML)Accessible overview of how projection lithography, DUV, and EUV work.
- The Rayleigh criterion ↗ (ASML)Explains how k₁, wavelength, and numerical aperture set resolution.
- Pushing k1 further ↗ (ASML)How illumination, resist, and mask techniques print below the wavelength.
- Silicon VLSI Technology: Fundamentals, Practice, and Modeling — J. D. Plummer, M. D. Deal, P. B. Griffin (Prentice Hall, 2000)Standard reference covering lithography within the full process flow.
- SEMI — global industry association for semiconductor manufacturing ↗ (SEMI)Industry standards and background on manufacturing equipment and materials.
Explore related concepts
Continue learning
Photolithography
Up next
Etching and Deposition
Chip Manufacturing
The two processes that add and remove material — used with lithography to build and shape a chip layer by layer.
Continue learning →