Physics Foundations · Topic 4 of 6
0%
Surface tension, wetting & capillarity
Why liquids pull themselves into narrow channels — the interfacial physics that lets a microfluidic device move fluid with no pump at all.
If you only remember three things
- Surface tension (γ) is the energy it costs to make new liquid surface — measured in J/m², which is the same quantity as a pull of N/m along the surface. It exists because molecules at an interface have fewer neighbours to bond with than molecules in the bulk.
- Whether a liquid spreads on a surface or beads up is set by the contact angle θ through Young's equation. For water, θ < 90° means the surface is hydrophilic (wetting); θ > 90° means hydrophobic (non-wetting).
- A curved interface supports a pressure jump — the Young–Laplace relation, ΔP = γ(1/R₁ + 1/R₂). In a wetting channel this capillary pressure sucks liquid in with no pump, which is the basis of capillary filling, paper devices and passive pumping.
- Surface forces scale with length while gravity and volume forces scale faster, so capillarity wins as things shrink. Below the capillary length (~2.7 mm for water) surface tension dominates gravity — and every microchannel is far below it.
What you’ll learn
- What surface tension is, and why an interface behaves differently from the bulk fluid
- The difference between surface energy and surface tension
- Wetting, contact angle, and Young's equation — with every symbol explained
- Capillary (Young–Laplace) pressure, capillary rise, and the capillary length
- Why capillarity dominates at the microscale, and how it shapes real devices
Intuition
Picture the molecules in a glass of water all tugging on their neighbours. Deep inside the liquid a molecule is pulled equally in every direction, so the pulls cancel. A molecule sitting at the top surface has water below but only air above, so it feels a net inward tug. The whole surface therefore behaves like a slightly stretched elastic skin that tries to shrink to the smallest possible area — that tendency is surface tension.
This is why a water strider can stand on a pond, why free droplets are round, and why a slightly overfilled glass can bulge above the rim without spilling: the surface resists being stretched.
Now line the inside of a thin straw with a material that water clings to. The water creeps up the walls to touch more of them, dragging the rest of the liquid up behind it — and the narrower the straw, the higher it climbs, with no pump involved. Shrink that straw to the width of a microfluidic channel and the effect becomes strong enough to fill an entire chip on its own.
The concept
At a liquid–gas interface, molecules in the bulk are surrounded on all sides by neighbours they attract and are attracted by, so the net force on them averages to zero. Molecules in the surface layer are missing neighbours on the vapour side, leaving a net inward attraction. Enlarging the surface means dragging more molecules out of the comfortable bulk into this higher-energy interfacial layer, and that costs energy. Surface tension, γ, is exactly that cost: the energy needed to create one unit of new interfacial area, set by the strength of the liquid's cohesive interactions (van der Waals forces, plus hydrogen bonding in water).
Because γ is an energy per unit area (J/m²), it is dimensionally identical to a force per unit length (N/m) — the same quantity written two ways. That is why surface tension can be pictured as a tension pulling along the surface, contracting it. For a clean water–air interface at room temperature γ ≈ 0.072 N/m; many organic solvents sit lower, around 0.02–0.03 N/m. (These are standard tabulated values, quoted here only to give a sense of scale.)
Surface energy versus surface tension: for a simple liquid the two are numerically equal, because a liquid can freely bring new molecules to its surface — stretching the area and creating new area are the same physical act. For a solid this is not generally true: a solid surface can be strained elastically without adding atoms, so the energy to create new surface (surface energy) and the mechanical stress in the existing surface (surface stress) differ. Throughout this lesson we stay in the liquid regime, where 'surface tension' and 'surface energy' can be used interchangeably.
Wetting describes how a liquid spreads on a solid. It is a contest between cohesion — the attraction of the liquid's molecules for each other — and adhesion — their attraction to the solid. When adhesion to the solid outweighs cohesion within the liquid, the drop spreads out; when cohesion wins, it beads up. The outcome is summarised by the contact angle θ, measured inside the liquid at the line where liquid, solid and vapour meet.
A low contact angle means the liquid wets the surface; a high angle means it does not. For water, a surface with θ < 90° is called hydrophilic ('water-loving') and one with θ > 90° hydrophobic ('water-fearing'). θ → 0° is complete wetting (the liquid spreads into a film); θ above roughly 150° with low adhesion is superhydrophobic, as on a lotus leaf. The same surface can wet one liquid and repel another, so 'hydrophobic' always refers to water specifically.
At equilibrium the contact angle is fixed by the balance of the three interfacial tensions meeting at the contact line. Balancing the pull along the solid gives Young's equation — the headline equation below — which ties the observable contact angle to the solid–vapour, solid–liquid and liquid–vapour tensions.
Capillarity is the movement of liquid into narrow spaces driven by these interfacial forces rather than by an external pump. Its engine is the pressure jump across a curved interface, the Young–Laplace relation ΔP = γ(1/R₁ + 1/R₂), where R₁ and R₂ are the two principal radii of curvature and ΔP is the pressure difference, higher on the concave side. A flat interface (infinite radii) has no jump; sharper curvature gives a larger one. For a spherical droplet of radius R both radii equal R, so ΔP = 2γ/R; for a long cylindrical meniscus one radius is effectively infinite, so ΔP = γ/R.
Why it matters
At the microscale surface tension is not a minor correction — it is often the dominant force. Understanding it is what lets you make a channel fill itself, form monodisperse droplets on demand, wick a sample through paper, or (just as importantly) diagnose why a channel refuses to fill or keeps trapping bubbles.
How it works
- Start from a curved interface. Young–Laplace says a curved surface carries a pressure jump ΔP = γ(1/R₁ + 1/R₂), with the higher pressure on the concave side. A flat interface has no jump; sharper curvature gives a larger one.
- Put that interface in a channel the liquid wets. Wetting (θ < 90°) curves the meniscus concave toward the air, so the pressure just inside the liquid is lower than the air ahead of it. In a circular channel of radius r the meniscus is a spherical cap of radius R = r/cos θ, giving a capillary pressure ΔP = 2γ·cos θ / r.
- That pressure deficit pulls liquid in. Acting like a built-in suction at the meniscus, it draws the liquid along the channel with no external pump — this is capillary filling. The smaller the radius r, the larger the driving pressure.
- Against gravity, the liquid rises until its weight balances the pull. Setting the capillary pressure equal to the hydrostatic pressure ρgh gives Jurin's law, h = 2γ·cos θ / (ρ·g·r): halve the tube radius and the liquid climbs twice as high.
- Gravity only matters above the capillary length. Comparing surface tension with gravity defines κ⁻¹ = √(γ/(ρg)) — about 2.7 mm for water. Below that scale (every microchannel) gravity is negligible and capillary pressure governs the behaviour.
- During filling, the advance is resisted by viscosity, not gravity. In a horizontal channel the filled length grows as the square root of time (the Lucas–Washburn behaviour, ℓ ∝ √t): fast at first, then slowing as the filled column lengthens.
The equation
Young's equation: the horizontal balance of interfacial tensions at the contact line. Rearranged, cos θ = (γₛᵥ − γₛₗ) / γₗᵥ.
Variables
| Symbol | Variable | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| γₛᵥ | Solid–vapour interfacial tension (energy of the dry solid surface) | N/m (= J/m²) |
| γₛₗ | Solid–liquid interfacial tension | N/m (= J/m²) |
| γₗᵥ | Liquid–vapour surface tension (the liquid's γ) | N/m (= J/m²) |
| θ | Equilibrium (Young) contact angle, measured through the liquid | degrees |
Assumptions
The equation above assumes:
- The surface is ideal: smooth, rigid, chemically uniform and non-reactive. Real roughness and chemical heterogeneity cause contact-angle hysteresis — a range of stable angles rather than a single θ.
- The system is at equilibrium with a stationary contact line; a moving contact line has a speed-dependent dynamic angle instead.
- The three interfacial tensions are well-defined and constant — no surfactant gradients, dissolution, or swelling of the solid.
- The balance is local to the contact line; gravity and overall drop size do not distort the wedge where the three phases meet.
- On rough or textured surfaces the apparent angle follows the Wenzel or Cassie–Baxter models, not the bare Young angle.
Reading the number
High value
Bond number Bo ≫ 1: gravity dominates surface tension. Interfaces behave like heavy pools — flat on top, shaped by weight. This is the everyday, large-scale regime.
Low value
Bo ≪ 1: surface tension dominates gravity. Interfaces are set by curvature and wetting, not weight; drops stay spherical and channels fill by capillarity. Microfluidics lives here.
The Bond number compares gravitational to interfacial forces, Bo = ρgL²/γ = (L/κ⁻¹)², where κ⁻¹ = √(γ/ρg) is the capillary length. Because it grows with L², shrinking the length scale drives Bo toward zero — which is exactly why capillarity, negligible in a bucket, takes over in a micrometre-wide channel.
Worked example
Illustrative calculation (using standard tabulated constants, not measured data). How large is water's capillary length, κ⁻¹ = √(γ/(ρg))? Take γ ≈ 0.072 N/m, ρ ≈ 1000 kg/m³, g ≈ 9.81 m/s²:
κ⁻¹ = √(0.072 / (1000 × 9.81)) = √(7.3×10⁻⁶) ≈ 2.7×10⁻³ m
About 2.7 mm. A 100 µm channel is roughly 27× smaller, so gravity is negligible there and surface tension rules — the number is illustrative, but the conclusion is general.
Microfluidic example
Capillary filling. Because ΔP = 2γ·cos θ / r grows as channels shrink, a hydrophilic microchannel fills itself the instant liquid touches its inlet — no pump, tubing or power. Many point-of-care chips load a sample simply by touching a drop to the port.
Paper and thread (paper microfluidics). Paper is a dense mesh of hydrophilic cellulose fibres — effectively millions of tiny capillaries. Patterning hydrophobic barriers into it channels the wicking, so a finger-prick of blood or a drop of urine flows to reaction zones entirely by capillarity. This underpins low-cost diagnostic strips.
Droplet generation. When two immiscible fluids meet at a T-junction or flow-focusing nozzle, surface tension resists stretching the interface and eventually pinches it into uniform droplets. The ratio of viscous shear to interfacial force — the capillary number Ca = μv/γ — selects the regime (dripping versus jetting) and the droplet size.
Open and passive microfluidics. Remove the channel roof and surface tension holds the liquid in an open groove, giving 'open microfluidics' that is easy to access and pipette into. Related passive-pumping schemes use the higher Laplace pressure of a small droplet (ΔP = 2γ/R) to push liquid toward a larger one, driving flow across a chip with nothing but two drops of different size.
Practical design implications
- Channel dimensions. Capillary pressure scales as 1/r, so smaller channels fill faster and pull harder — but also resist harder if you ever need to push a meniscus back. Size r for the capillary drive you actually want.
- Surface treatment and contact angle. The sign of cos θ decides everything: a hydrophilic wall (θ < 90°) makes a channel self-fill, while a hydrophobic wall (θ > 90°) resists filling and can trap air. PDMS is natively hydrophobic and gradually recovers hydrophobicity after plasma treatment, so time-sensitive filling must account for surface ageing.
- Fluid properties. Surface tension varies with the liquid, temperature and especially surfactants — adding surfactant lowers γ, weakening capillary filling but stabilising droplets. Design around your working fluid's γ, not water's.
- Geometry and corners. Sharp interior corners and abrupt expansions can pin or arrest a meniscus; a sudden change in width may stop capillary flow entirely or trap a bubble. Smooth, gently converging geometries fill more reliably.
- Trapped air and venting. Capillarity can fill faster than air escapes, so dead-ends and pockets need vents or hydrophilic guiding features — otherwise bubbles will block the channel.
Common mistakes
Watch out for:
- Confusing surface energy and surface tension. For liquids they are the same number; the distinction only bites for solids, where surface stress and surface energy differ.
- Measuring the contact angle on the wrong side. θ is measured through the liquid — a 30° hydrophilic surface and a 150° hydrophobic surface are genuinely different, not the same angle measured two ways.
- Assuming wettability is fixed. Contact angle drifts with contamination, oxidation and (for plasma-treated PDMS) time, so the θ you designed for may not be the θ at the bench.
- Using ΔP = 2γ/R for a channel meniscus. That spherical form is for a droplet; a cylindrical channel gives ΔP = 2γ·cos θ / r via R = r/cos θ, and a slit-like channel differs again.
- Invoking gravity where it does not belong. Below the capillary length, Jurin-style height limits are irrelevant to a horizontal chip; the filling rate is set by viscosity (∝ √t), not by ρgh.
Researcher notes(advanced)
- Young's equation assumes an ideal surface. Real surfaces show contact-angle hysteresis — a gap between advancing and receding angles caused by roughness and chemical heterogeneity — so report both angles for serious work rather than a single equilibrium θ.
- On rough or textured surfaces the apparent angle follows the Wenzel (fully wetted) or Cassie–Baxter (air-trapped) models rather than the bare Young angle; superhydrophobicity is usually a Cassie state (see Quéré, 2008).
- The Lucas–Washburn ℓ ∝ √t result assumes fully developed laminar flow, a constant contact angle and negligible inertia and gravity; the earliest instants of filling are inertia- or visco-inertially limited and deviate from √t.
- The dynamic contact angle depends on contact-line speed (through the capillary number), so the θ in ΔP = 2γ·cos θ / r during fast filling is not the static equilibrium value.
- Surface tension falls with temperature, and gradients in γ from temperature or surfactant concentration drive Marangoni flows — an effect separate from the pressure-driven capillarity covered here.
Keep going
Further reading
- Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena: Drops, Bubbles, Pearls, Waves ↗ — P.-G. de Gennes, F. Brochard-Wyart & D. Quéré (Springer, 2004)The standard graduate-level treatment of surface tension, wetting and capillarity.
- Wetting and roughness — D. Quéré (Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 38, 71–99, 2008)doi:10.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.132434
- An essay on the cohesion of fluids — T. Young (Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 95, 65–87, 1805)doi:10.1098/rstl.1805.0005The original source of the contact-angle relation now called Young's equation.
- The dynamics of capillary flow — E. W. Washburn (Phys. Rev. 17, 273–283, 1921)doi:10.1103/PhysRev.17.273The origin of the ℓ ∝ √t (Lucas–Washburn) capillary-filling law.
- Microfluidics: fluid physics at the nanoliter scale — T. M. Squires & S. R. Quake (Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 977–1026, 2005)doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.77.977
- Engineering flows in small devices: microfluidics toward a lab-on-a-chip — H. A. Stone, A. D. Stroock & A. Ajdari (Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 381–411, 2004)doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.36.050802.122124
- The origins and the future of microfluidics — G. M. Whitesides (Nature 442, 368–373, 2006)doi:10.1038/nature05058
- Diagnostics for the developing world: microfluidic paper-based analytical devices — A. W. Martinez, S. T. Phillips, G. M. Whitesides & E. Carrilho (Anal. Chem. 82, 3–10, 2010)doi:10.1021/ac9013989
Continue learning
Surface tension, wetting & capillarity
Up next
Diffusion
Physics Foundations
Why mixing at the microscale is slow, and how to estimate how long it takes.
Continue learning →